Difference between revisions of "Vendor Page"

From VistApedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(Bhaskar's vision for a VistA vendor)
 
(Who should be a VistA Vendor?)
 
(7 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
+
(In development)
==Packaging and deploying VistA==
 
  
The following discussion was excerpted from a thread on Hardhats.
+
== Who should be a VistA Vendor? ==
  
* [http://groups.google.com/group/Hardhats/browse_thread/thread/6b5fb65257abe677?hl=en "Front End over VA VistA"]
+
* [[Bhaskars_Opinion_on_Vendors|Bhaskar's Opinion Regarding VistA Vendors]]
 
 
==Bhaskar's Vision for WorldVistA Vendors==
 
 
 
K.S. Bhaskar Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 16:21:57 -0400
 
 
 
For what it's worth, I don't think most doctors should be
 
installing VistA on a PC; or even installing an operating system on a
 
PC; or, come to think of it, managing VistA on a PC.
 
 
 
[That's not to say that some set of doctors are not capable of doing it. I am just saying that majority should not be doing it any more than I
 
should be practicing medicine. Doctors don't even treat themselves - my
 
uncle, a nephrologist, says, "A doctor who treats himself has a fool for
 
a patient."]
 
 
 
IMHO*, the best way to deploy VistA at the primary care level is to
 
package it as an appliance, with a service contract (maybe like a
 
sterilizer, EKG machine, fire extinguisher, or photo copier).  Practices
 
are accustomed to dealing with appliances and service contracts.  A
 
practice signs up for VistA, a vendor configures it on an inexpensive PC
 
(set up with encrypted file systems or encrypted databases, in case it
 
gets stolen) and ships it to the practice.  They plug it in, connect it
 
to the LAN, and turn it on - it's ready for use (since it comes
 
preconfigured with user ids, access codes, etc.).  Maybe someone from
 
the vendor goes out for half a day to set up and hold the hand of anyone
 
that needs a hand held.
 
 
 
The VistA appliance calls home via a secure connection over the
 
Internet.  The vendor has an environment to which the practice's
 
database is streamed so it is current to within millibleems of the
 
database at the practice.  All administration of VistA at the practice
 
is done remotely by the vendor.%  There is excellent response because
 
VistA is being accessed on the LAN.
 
 
 
In the event the appliance dies, the practices switches to VistA in the
 
vendor's environment in seconds to minutes (there are multiple ways to
 
do this).  Now, they have exactly the same VistA environment and
 
database that they had a few moments before, but it is just slightly
 
less responsive because the connection is over the Internet rather than
 
on the LAN.  The vendor sends a replacement (PCs are cheap enough) with
 
a copy of the practice's environment from the vendor's data center.  The
 
practice plugs it in and it catches up.  At a mutually convenient time,
 
the roles are switched so that the appliance at the practice is once
 
more the primary and that in the vendor's data center is once more a
 
secondary.
 
 
 
The vendor charges a fee for the service (whether it is $10/month,
 
$100/month or $1000/month - that will be determined by the market).  The
 
practice has a predictable monthly cost and the vendor has predictable
 
revenue.
 
 
 
The practice never sees the roll and scroll interface unless it breaks
 
the glass.  The vendor does, of course, but that's OK.  That's what the
 
vendor does.
 
 
 
All of this can be done today.  Comments are welcome.
 
 
 
Regards
 
-- Bhaskar
 
 
 
<pre>
 
* Isn't it interesting that In My Humble Opinion and In My Hubristic Opinion have the same acronym?
 
 
 
% It's trivial to implement an electronic "break the glass" to give the
 
practice access to the data without the cooperation of the vendor if &
 
when they need it (vendor goes out of business, contract dispute,
 
whatever), but to also record that the glass was broken.
 
</pre>
 
 
Vipen Mahajan Date: Sat, 16 May 2009 22:06:24 +0530
 
 
 
Hi Bhaskar,
 
Good overview concept. Some questions, :
 
# How does the doctor get trained to use VistA, or CPRS?  Can we put this training into say Moodle, with screen shots, and a narrative to explain
 
# How about the reservations of providers, to touching the keyboard even. Esp for the the older ones.
 
# How reliable is the virtual machine/appliance, the file system etc for a production environment, now?
 
# Is the Vendors' server on the cloud? EC2?
 
# How about the conversion of the older charts etc.
 
 
 
Regards,
 
Vipen
 
 
 
--
 
Vipen Mahajan
 
 
 
Principal
 
Leo Systems
 
Chicago/Boston/Munich/New Delhi.
 
 
 
K.S. Bhaskar Date: Sat, 16 May 2009 18:34:29 -0400
 
 
 
> 1. Training
 
 
[KSB] This could go into Moodle.  Or it could be part of the marketing /
 
selling additional services that the vendor provides.
 
 
 
> 2. How about the reservations of providers, to touching the keyboard even. Esp for the the older ones.
 
 
 
[KSB] Maybe dictation / transcription / electronic signature (they will
 
at least have to touch the PC for that last).
 
 
 
> 3. How reliable is the virtual machine/appliance, the file system etc for a production environment, now?
 
 
 
[KSB] I am not talking about a virtual machine at the practice - I am
 
talking about an appliance which is a real Linux PC on which VistA runs. They can see it, touch it and feel it, just as they can a sterilizer,
 
photo copier, EKG machine, etc.
 
 
 
But I have become more comfortable with virtual machines for production
 
use.  For example, with QEMU/kvm, you can create a virtual disk with
 
something like "-drive file=myVistA.qcow,index=0,media=disk,cache=none"
 
or cache=writethrough.  So, while it is the business of the universe to
 
be imperfect, I think using one of these options is fine for production,
 
especially in a logical multi-site configuration.
 
 
 
> 4. Is the Vendors' server on the cloud? EC2?
 
 
 
[KSB] It can be.  But I don't think a cloudy machine is economical if
 
you run it 24x7.  It would be better to get a hosted virtual machine
 
from an ISP such as linode.com.
 
 
 
As a practical matter, since a vendor will make money not on a single
 
practice, but on volume, I suspect it will be most cost effective for
 
vendors to have their own servers (probably hosted at an ISP).
 
 
 
In any case, the economics of hosting servers is not VistA specific.  I
 
was only focusing on that part of the business that was specific to VistA.
 
 
 
> 5. How about the conversion of the older charts etc.
 
 
 
[KSB] Whatever solution works for VistA works for my proposed packaging
 
and deployment.  There are scanning solutions for documents that have
 
been connected with VistA.
 
 
 
Regards
 
-- Bhaskar
 

Latest revision as of 20:48, 31 January 2010

(In development)

Who should be a VistA Vendor?