Difference between revisions of "Ignacio Valdes Implementation Log/Episode14"

From VistApedia
Jump to: navigation, search
 
Line 1: Line 1:
Further along the Road Less Traveled: Psychiatric patients frequently
 
have to sign consents for medication and other things. I am told that
 
the VA uses only proprietary systems like iMedConsent(tm) for this. I
 
have no doubts that Intracare will not be able to afford this or have
 
the desire to gum up the works with proprietary stuff. After having
 
the why-o-why-did-the-VA-decide-on-proprietary reaction for this, Is
 
there another way? I hope this does not become a show-stopper...
 
  
-- IV
 
 
    Reply to author    Forward 
 
 
 
 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
 
To post a message you must first join this group.
 
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
 
You do not have the permission required to post.
 
 
 
2.  Matt King 
 
View profile 
 
More options Sep 23 2008, 3:01 pm
 
From: Matt King <flydo...@gmail.com>
 
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 13:01:10 -0700 (PDT)
 
Local: Tues, Sep 23 2008 3:01 pm
 
Subject: Re: Intracare Implementation Log Episode 15: Non-proprietary signature consenting of patients.
 
Reply to author | Forward | Print | Individual message | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author
 
We just scan in the consents.
 
m
 
 
On Sep 23, 9:34 am, "Ignacio Valdes" <ival...@hal-pc.org> wrote:
 
 
- Hide quoted text -
 
- Show quoted text -
 
> Further along the Road Less Traveled: Psychiatric patients frequently
 
> have to sign consents for medication and other things. I am told that
 
> the VA uses only proprietary systems like iMedConsent(tm) for this. I
 
> have no doubts that Intracare will not be able to afford this or have
 
> the desire to gum up the works with proprietary stuff. After having
 
> the why-o-why-did-the-VA-decide-on-proprietary reaction for this, Is
 
> there another way? I hope this does not become a show-stopper...
 
 
> -- IV
 
 
 
    Reply to author    Forward     
 
Report spam
 
Reporting spam
 
Message reported
 
    Rate this post: Text for clearing space
 
 
 
 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
 
To post a message you must first join this group.
 
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
 
You do not have the permission required to post.
 
 
 
3.  I, Valdes 
 
View profile 
 
More options Sep 23 2008, 4:30 pm
 
From: "I, Valdes" <ival...@hal-pc.org>
 
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 14:30:18 -0700 (PDT)
 
Local: Tues, Sep 23 2008 4:30 pm
 
Subject: Re: Intracare Implementation Log Episode 15: Non-proprietary signature consenting of patients.
 
Reply to author | Forward | Print | Individual message | Show original | Remove | Report this message | Find messages by this author
 
What is the sequence for scanning stuff? Does it go to an intermediate
 
neutral stage like a pdf before it goes into cprs or directly into
 
CPRS? We have a high-dollar Toshiba fax/scan/copier. I know this topic
 
has been around for years.
 
 
-- IV
 
 
On Sep 23, 3:01 pm, Matt King <flydo...@gmail.com> wrote:
 
 
- Hide quoted text -
 
- Show quoted text -
 
> We just scan in the consents.
 
> m
 
 
> On Sep 23, 9:34 am, "Ignacio Valdes" <ival...@hal-pc.org> wrote:
 
 
> > Further along the Road Less Traveled: Psychiatric patients frequently
 
> > have to sign consents for medication and other things. I am told that
 
> > the VA uses only proprietary systems like iMedConsent(tm) for this. I
 
> > have no doubts that Intracare will not be able to afford this or have
 
> > the desire to gum up the works with proprietary stuff. After having
 
> > the why-o-why-did-the-VA-decide-on-proprietary reaction for this, Is
 
> > there another way? I hope this does not become a show-stopper...
 
 
> > -- IV
 
 
 
    Reply to author    Forward 
 
 
 
 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
 
To post a message you must first join this group.
 
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
 
You do not have the permission required to post.
 
 
 
4.  Nancy Anthracite 
 
View profile 
 
More options Sep 23 2008, 4:36 pm
 
From: Nancy Anthracite <nanthrac...@verizon.net>
 
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 17:36:21 -0400
 
Local: Tues, Sep 23 2008 4:36 pm
 
Subject: Re: [Hardhats] Re: Intracare Implementation Log Episode 15: Non-proprietary signature consenting of patients.
 
Reply to author | Forward | Print | Individual message | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author
 
You can install scanning quite easily and see for yourself.  CPRS has an icon
 
indicating there is a scan and it is pulled from an image directory tree
 
which may be on a separate machine.
 
 
http://www.opensourcevista.net:8888/NancysVistAServer/Scanning/
 
 
On Tuesday 23 September 2008, I, Valdes wrote:
 
 
- Hide quoted text -
 
- Show quoted text -
 
> What is the sequence for scanning stuff? Does it go to an intermediate
 
> neutral stage like a pdf before it goes into cprs or directly into
 
> CPRS? We have a high-dollar Toshiba fax/scan/copier. I know this topic
 
> has been around for years.
 
 
> -- IV
 
 
> On Sep 23, 3:01 pm, Matt King <flydo...@gmail.com> wrote:
 
> > We just scan in the consents.
 
> > m
 
 
> > On Sep 23, 9:34 am, "Ignacio Valdes" <ival...@hal-pc.org> wrote:
 
> > > Further along the Road Less Traveled: Psychiatric patients frequently
 
> > > have to sign consents for medication and other things. I am told that
 
> > > the VA uses only proprietary systems like iMedConsent(tm) for this. I
 
> > > have no doubts that Intracare will not be able to afford this or have
 
> > > the desire to gum up the works with proprietary stuff. After having
 
> > > the why-o-why-did-the-VA-decide-on-proprietary reaction for this, Is
 
> > > there another way? I hope this does not become a show-stopper...
 
 
> > > -- IV
 
 
--
 
Nancy Anthracite
 

Revision as of 16:19, 9 September 2009