|
|
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| Further along the Road Less Traveled: Psychiatric patients frequently
| |
| have to sign consents for medication and other things. I am told that
| |
| the VA uses only proprietary systems like iMedConsent(tm) for this. I
| |
| have no doubts that Intracare will not be able to afford this or have
| |
| the desire to gum up the works with proprietary stuff. After having
| |
| the why-o-why-did-the-VA-decide-on-proprietary reaction for this, Is
| |
| there another way? I hope this does not become a show-stopper...
| |
|
| |
|
| -- IV
| |
|
| |
| Reply to author Forward
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| You must Sign in before you can post messages.
| |
| To post a message you must first join this group.
| |
| Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
| |
| You do not have the permission required to post.
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| 2. Matt King
| |
| View profile
| |
| More options Sep 23 2008, 3:01 pm
| |
| From: Matt King <flydo...@gmail.com>
| |
| Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 13:01:10 -0700 (PDT)
| |
| Local: Tues, Sep 23 2008 3:01 pm
| |
| Subject: Re: Intracare Implementation Log Episode 15: Non-proprietary signature consenting of patients.
| |
| Reply to author | Forward | Print | Individual message | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author
| |
| We just scan in the consents.
| |
| m
| |
|
| |
| On Sep 23, 9:34 am, "Ignacio Valdes" <ival...@hal-pc.org> wrote:
| |
|
| |
| - Hide quoted text -
| |
| - Show quoted text -
| |
| > Further along the Road Less Traveled: Psychiatric patients frequently
| |
| > have to sign consents for medication and other things. I am told that
| |
| > the VA uses only proprietary systems like iMedConsent(tm) for this. I
| |
| > have no doubts that Intracare will not be able to afford this or have
| |
| > the desire to gum up the works with proprietary stuff. After having
| |
| > the why-o-why-did-the-VA-decide-on-proprietary reaction for this, Is
| |
| > there another way? I hope this does not become a show-stopper...
| |
|
| |
| > -- IV
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| Reply to author Forward
| |
| Report spam
| |
| Reporting spam
| |
| Message reported
| |
| Rate this post: Text for clearing space
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| You must Sign in before you can post messages.
| |
| To post a message you must first join this group.
| |
| Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
| |
| You do not have the permission required to post.
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| 3. I, Valdes
| |
| View profile
| |
| More options Sep 23 2008, 4:30 pm
| |
| From: "I, Valdes" <ival...@hal-pc.org>
| |
| Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 14:30:18 -0700 (PDT)
| |
| Local: Tues, Sep 23 2008 4:30 pm
| |
| Subject: Re: Intracare Implementation Log Episode 15: Non-proprietary signature consenting of patients.
| |
| Reply to author | Forward | Print | Individual message | Show original | Remove | Report this message | Find messages by this author
| |
| What is the sequence for scanning stuff? Does it go to an intermediate
| |
| neutral stage like a pdf before it goes into cprs or directly into
| |
| CPRS? We have a high-dollar Toshiba fax/scan/copier. I know this topic
| |
| has been around for years.
| |
|
| |
| -- IV
| |
|
| |
| On Sep 23, 3:01 pm, Matt King <flydo...@gmail.com> wrote:
| |
|
| |
| - Hide quoted text -
| |
| - Show quoted text -
| |
| > We just scan in the consents.
| |
| > m
| |
|
| |
| > On Sep 23, 9:34 am, "Ignacio Valdes" <ival...@hal-pc.org> wrote:
| |
|
| |
| > > Further along the Road Less Traveled: Psychiatric patients frequently
| |
| > > have to sign consents for medication and other things. I am told that
| |
| > > the VA uses only proprietary systems like iMedConsent(tm) for this. I
| |
| > > have no doubts that Intracare will not be able to afford this or have
| |
| > > the desire to gum up the works with proprietary stuff. After having
| |
| > > the why-o-why-did-the-VA-decide-on-proprietary reaction for this, Is
| |
| > > there another way? I hope this does not become a show-stopper...
| |
|
| |
| > > -- IV
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| Reply to author Forward
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| You must Sign in before you can post messages.
| |
| To post a message you must first join this group.
| |
| Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
| |
| You do not have the permission required to post.
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| 4. Nancy Anthracite
| |
| View profile
| |
| More options Sep 23 2008, 4:36 pm
| |
| From: Nancy Anthracite <nanthrac...@verizon.net>
| |
| Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 17:36:21 -0400
| |
| Local: Tues, Sep 23 2008 4:36 pm
| |
| Subject: Re: [Hardhats] Re: Intracare Implementation Log Episode 15: Non-proprietary signature consenting of patients.
| |
| Reply to author | Forward | Print | Individual message | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author
| |
| You can install scanning quite easily and see for yourself. CPRS has an icon
| |
| indicating there is a scan and it is pulled from an image directory tree
| |
| which may be on a separate machine.
| |
|
| |
| http://www.opensourcevista.net:8888/NancysVistAServer/Scanning/
| |
|
| |
| On Tuesday 23 September 2008, I, Valdes wrote:
| |
|
| |
| - Hide quoted text -
| |
| - Show quoted text -
| |
| > What is the sequence for scanning stuff? Does it go to an intermediate
| |
| > neutral stage like a pdf before it goes into cprs or directly into
| |
| > CPRS? We have a high-dollar Toshiba fax/scan/copier. I know this topic
| |
| > has been around for years.
| |
|
| |
| > -- IV
| |
|
| |
| > On Sep 23, 3:01 pm, Matt King <flydo...@gmail.com> wrote:
| |
| > > We just scan in the consents.
| |
| > > m
| |
|
| |
| > > On Sep 23, 9:34 am, "Ignacio Valdes" <ival...@hal-pc.org> wrote:
| |
| > > > Further along the Road Less Traveled: Psychiatric patients frequently
| |
| > > > have to sign consents for medication and other things. I am told that
| |
| > > > the VA uses only proprietary systems like iMedConsent(tm) for this. I
| |
| > > > have no doubts that Intracare will not be able to afford this or have
| |
| > > > the desire to gum up the works with proprietary stuff. After having
| |
| > > > the why-o-why-did-the-VA-decide-on-proprietary reaction for this, Is
| |
| > > > there another way? I hope this does not become a show-stopper...
| |
|
| |
| > > > -- IV
| |
|
| |
| --
| |
| Nancy Anthracite
| |
